Public Enemy No. 1
If a new law passes, New York City will ban Crisco use in restaurants, although it appears that it might remain on store shelves, for a while at least.
This might make it hard for vegans to enjoy pastries, since the only substitute for Crisco is butter or lard. A total ban on Crisco would also radically reshape how busy people cook, since--as anyone who's ever watched Jacques and Julia knows--when you make your crust with butter, you have to chill the crust in between mixing it and rolling it out.
Further, I think such a law might oppress those of a certain class position who were raised with Crisco. I know, the diet was subsidized and legislated... But one could say the same for "Border" (Tex-Mex) food, with its tripe, mystery meat, and "refried beans," the culinary leftovers from white society's desire for filets and T-bones.
And some might argue that tripe is also dangerous. But just try to ban it, I dare you...
I say, rise up in defense of Crisco!
5 Comments:
Though I would not use it today (unless I were to make my mother's delectable icing), I agree. What business does the gov'ment have in this affair? Besides, there was a kid in the late 70s who benefited greatly from Crisco. He had some skin condition of which his only reprieve was the slathering of Crisco on his body...
Yes, exactly! For that kid, Crisco was a lifesaver. What would that kid have done in NYC in 2008, when Crisco will have gone the way of such dangerous products as DDT, lead paint, and those pull-tab pop cans?
MY GOD! I STILL use crisco (as opposed to lard) in my biscuit recipties and the like....what the hell?!?!?!
Yes, my response exactly. I had heard all about these "TRANS FATS" and thought, yes, ban "trans fats," see if I care, whatever...
Then Rachel said, "You know, that's Crisco."
"OH REALLY?!!!!!"
Chalk another one up for Newspeak.
Also, Jamie, did you like that little unacknowledged ref to Jose Limon and "Carne, Carneles, & the carnivalesque..."?
Post a Comment
<< Home